In defamation law, a plaintiff must prove five elements: the statement was made or published by the defendant, it was about the plaintiff, it was false, it had a defamatory implication, and it was designed and intended by the defendant. The Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard trial (2020) demonstrated that even public figures can successfully prove defamation when they meet the high burden of proof, with the jury awarding Depp $15 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages against Heard, while Heard only won $2 million against Depp's agent. The case highlighted the 'actual malice' standard required for public figures and showed that legal outcomes can differ significantly from public opinion.
Amber Heard Verdict Explained: Why Johnny Depp Won the Defamation Trial
Added:here we go it's time here we go all right mr foreperson is this the verdict of the jury all right is it unanimous thank you sir all right let's see it here we go in civil case number cl 2019 mr depp's claim against ms heard here we go one as to the statement appearing in the online op-ed in the washington post online edition i spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath that has to change end quote do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes damn proven by a greater weight of the evidence oh [ __ ] the statement was made or published by ms hurd yes the state question the statement is mr depp answer yes question yeah statement was false answer yes oh my god this statement has a defamatory oh my god about mr depp answer yes w boys implication was designed and intended by ms heard answer yes yep that's right due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement it conveyed a defamation indication to someone who saw it other than mr depp answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear oh my god that miss heard acted with actual malice answer yes true so true as to the statement appearing in the op-ed in the washington post online edition then two years ago i became a public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out end quote do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes has mr deb proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms hurd answer yes question the statement was about mr depp answer yes question the statement was false answer yes question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp who was the answer yes who was [ __ ] here question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms hurd answer question due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr debt it sure didn't answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms heard acted with actual malice yes answer yes that's true three as to the statement appearing in the op-ed quote i had the rare vantage point of seeing in real time how institutions protect men accused of abuse end quote do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes wow has mr debt proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms hurd answer yes jesus question the statement was about mr death answer yes question the statement was false answer yes question the statement has a defamatory implication jesus man answer yes question the defamatory implications oh my god designed and intended by ms heard answer yes all yes's holy [ __ ] circumstances surrounding the publication of this statement it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr death answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence let's hear it again acted with actual malice answer yes as against amber heard we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars as the member heard we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of five million dollars oh my god civil case number cl 2019 2911. holy [ __ ] claim against mr depp 15. as to this statement appearing in the april 8th 2020 online edition of the daily mail quote amber heard and her friends in the media use fake sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield depending on their needs they have selected some of her sexual violence hoax facts as the sword and inflicting them on the public and mr depp man do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no two as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail this was an ambush a hoax they set mr depp up by calling the cops but the first attempt did not do the trick the officers came to the penthouses thoroughly searched and interviewed and left after seeing no damage to the property wow so amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up got their story straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist and then placed a second call to 911.
tell it say it was do you find that miss heard has proven all the elements of defamation say it was answer yes oh has heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question mr waldman while acting as an agent this is interesting now things are interesting answer yes question the statement was about ms heard answer yes okay question the statement was seen by someone other than ms heard that they award her 15 million question the statement was false answer yes do you find that ms heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by mr waldman was made with actual malice answer yes three as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail quote we've reached the beginning of the end it's a plot twist against johnny depp end quote do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no as against john c depp ii we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of two million dollars as against john c depp ii we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of zero dollars does either side wish to have the jury pulled yes your honor oh man if this is your verdict please answer yes if this is not your verdict please answer no juror number six juror number 29 yes i do find that this is discount ladies and gentlemen this concludes your service in this case i want to thank you again for your dedication and your hard work during this trial i know i speak for everybody here when i appreciate tell you that we appreciate your sacrifices and your time and your public service in this match wow okay so i'm going to have you go back to the jury deliberation room for one more uh time and then we'll release you from there okay all right thank you holy [ __ ] [ __ ] holy [ __ ] [ __ ] god damn i i can't believe that in accordance with law i want the punitive damages wow award to the statutory cap of 350 000 on mr depp's award okay holy [ __ ] oh my [ __ ] god wow so they both win but ambrose's bigger bill yeah johnny's got to pay her 2 million and she has to pay him 15 million 15 [ __ ] million dollars oh my god what a what a bad day for her what a bad [ __ ] day offset it down to 13 million that's pretty much where we're at she got got bro i can't believe this [ __ ] i cannot [ __ ] believe this [ __ ] it actually happened i like it's one thing to talk about it it's one thing to think about it's one thing to hope that it could happen but here we are and it [ __ ] did it actually happened he [ __ ] won i can't believe it yeah he won big time yeah it was not just like barely he [ __ ] just that was that was a clean sweep all three of them man everything oh my god 13 million hashtag big wins only there it is is anyone else nervous all right mr foreperson is this the verdict of the jury all right is it unanimous thank you sir jamie that's kind of huge i think case number cl 2019-2911 mr depp's claim against him is heard one as to the statement appearing in the online op-ed do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes has mr debt proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms heard answer yes the state question the statement was about mr depp answer yes question the statement was false answer yes question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes you guys were all right question oh my god wait i need to know that i give him a dollar was designed and intended my time is heard my guess correct one two as to the statement appearing in the op-ed question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes wow question the defamatory implications was designed and intended by ms hurd answer yes three as to the statement appearing in the op-ed i had the rare vantage point of seeing in real time how institutions i feel like this one might be known maybe end quote do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes oh my gosh has mr debt proven by a greater weight of no bm but she's getting that question the statement was made or published by ms heard answer yes question the statement was about mr deb please stop spamming yes turd pack r.i.p bozo i can't help but laugh answer yes as against amber heard we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars as against amber heard we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of five million dollars in civil case number cl 2019-2911 heard's claim against mr depp one as to this statement appearing in the april 8 2020 online edition of the daily mail she should have given her money to charity bro do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no [Music] two my job appearing in the april 27th as against john c depp ii wait so did they say one of his statements compensatory damages in the amount of 2 million as against john c depp ii we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of zero dollars wow that was an insanely probably interesting two dollars trial curiosity guys was that not crazy was that not wow that was really really really interesting to follow oh i like camille and all the worst is done uh i cannot support her if she doesn't win it keeps getting worse all right come on come on come on come on this is sick i i don't want to be i don't be weird or whatever i think she's wearing like like padded juicers it's fashion come on spit it out all right mr four person is this the verdict of the jury all right is it unanimous thank you sir jamie it's venomous wait a minute he i think he actually won tonight do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes has mr debt proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms heard answer yes the state question the statement was about mr depp answer yes question the statement was false answer yes question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms heard answer yes question due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr depp answer yes holy do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual malice answer yes with malice too that's crazy two as to the statement appearing in the op-ed do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes oh my has mr deb proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms heard answer yes holy question the statement was about home run answer yes yes question the statement was false answer yes oh my god question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr deb answer yes jesus question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms hurd answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms heard acted with actual malice answer yes holy that's that's hardcore three as to the statement appearing in the op-ed yes question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes this is crazy question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by a massive answer yes as against amber heard we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars okay as against andrew we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of five million dollars in civil case number cl 2019 2911 ms heard's claim against mr depp one 15 mil as to this statement appearing in the april 8 2020 online edition of the daily mail nowhere she wins that vote do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no two as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes okay question the statement was false answer yes what do you find that ms heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by mr waldman was made with actual malice answer yes three as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no okay okay as against john c depp the second same we the jury signed compensatory damages in the amount of two million dollars as against john c depp ii we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of zero dollars does either side wish to have the jury pulled yes your honor jamie members of the jury i do find that the jury's verdict is unanimous ladies and gentlemen this concludes your service in this case i want to thank you again for your dedication and your hard work during this trial and i know i speak foreign i actually can't believe it when i appreciate i actually can't believe it because i'm not kidding because i was kind of hoping for this outcome but i didn't think i didn't think it was possible i didn't think that the jury would be unanimous understands that that they if proven malice that's really hard to prove but i guess that's why that's why he brings the trial and you have a jury is that it can happen because objectively guys because objectively it is impossible to prove analysts it's sometimes just it's not brewable but it's a trial and there's a jury so i guess they decide if they feel like it was done with malice and they they said you know yes yes how do you remember this you can't that's insane that's absolutely crazy compensatory damages guys you guys guys guys i want to be cliche or crunch order but this is actually this is like a a pretty big cultural moment i feel like on the internet anyway outside the courtroom where you can see these fans as i said every time a judgment was read in favor of johnny depp a huge crowd cheers went up here the crowd cheering johnny johnny um clearly because this is like a high tier case outside the courtroom right now um that one's global about the fact to be here you just can't say dumb [ __ ] about somebody else if not true or you can't prove it and if you do so you get smoked where's johnny she's here where's johnny i want pirates i hope he comes in as jack sparrow he's in the uk why oh he's filming pirates yes all right mr four person is this the verdict of the jury all right is it unanimous thank you sir jamie mr depp's claim against ms heard one as to the statement appearing in the online op-ed do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms heard acted with actual malice answer yes two as to the statement appearing in the op ed do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes well her career is over question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms hurd answer yes three as to the statement appearing in the op-ed question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms heard answer yes oh my god as against amber heard we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of 10 million dollars as against amber heard we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of 5 million dollars civil case number cl 2019 2911 ms heard's claim against mr depp one as to this statement appearing in the april 8 2020 online edition of the daily mail do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no two as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes question the statement was false answer yes what do you find that ms heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by mr waldman was made with actual malice answer yes as against john c depp ii we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of two million dollars as against john c depp ii we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of zero dollars i do find that the jury's verdict is unanimous ladies and gentlemen this concludes your service in this case that's it they almost caught captain jack sparrow i i didn't hear the end apparently i didn't hear what happened okay in accordance with the law i will amend the all right report is adjourned thank you all right what a great cast this was an epic season what a finale they take her to the front i guess so she can escape so what i did like i didn't hear the conclusion because so much of her like words were riddled with like question end of sentence end quote quote like like i just kind of lost i i'm not used to listening to someone speak like that on top of that the constant repeating of quotes and [ __ ] it's just i fell asleep um what was the result overall amber lost hard amber owes 13 million dollars okay so amber owes johnny 13 million dollars cool all right well that's uh and and finale that's it this is awkwardly quiet um i just feel like you know they could have at least left a cliffhanger for like the next episode like they are outside the courtroom where you can see these fans as i said every time a judgment was read in favor of [Laughter] like something to be excited about the next season bro this is like we can't even watch this dude i don't know what's going on like youtube is br youtube live streams are broken brother mr four person is this the verdict of the jury all right is it unanimous thank you sir unanimous oh [ __ ] oh [ __ ] i mean of course in civil case numbers prediction mr depp's claim against ms heard one as to the statement appearing in the online op-ed do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes has mr deb proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms heard answer yes the state question the statement was about mr depp answer yes question the statement was false answer yes oh question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes oh questions god the internet is going to be [ __ ] it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr depp answer yes do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms heard acted with actual malice answer is going to be mad at you on twitter i don't go [ __ ] incels are always mad at me on twitter that is [ __ ] good next to the statement appearing in the op-ed that's for women this is insane i don't think people are understanding that mr d this does not happen this does not happen in america i don't think there's ever been a singular instance where someone lost the defamation case in the uk where the standards are way easier and want it in america question the state about foster depth answer yes question the statement was false answer that's crazy question the statement has a defamatory implication about mr depp answer yes question the defamatory implication was designed and intended by ms hurd answer yes do you find that it doesn't take us this doesn't create a legal precedent but it's a president in the sense that like it's an attitude shift with actual malice answer yes bro she is so fast as to the statement appearing in the op-ed entitled case against the sun for women but it doesn't matter because the same principle harder standard to prove and the online up that's crazy amber heard do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes well i guess he didn't just win the public i guess he didn't win the just the public court of opinion boys i guess he won in the [ __ ] actual court too inventory implications due to circumstances surrounding the publication of this statement it conveyed bro the morals of stories listen if you're an abusive person don't write a [ __ ] article about uh being a victim of domestic violence do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that's all i'm going to say acted with actual malice even if you yourself are a victim of domestic violence in certain points don't be a violent domestic abuser and then [ __ ] write an article about how you were the victim award compensatory damages because if they hadn't settled this 10 million dollars like they originally did against amber heard and she didn't [ __ ] go on this conquest this would not have happened straight up in civil case number cl 2019 2911. also those lawyers are the worst lawyers in america like literally one as to this did you say she would win though i said there's no [ __ ] shot given the standard and how much higher is in the united states this has never happened her friends in the media like a similar court case has been won in the uk where the standards on the other party lost depending on the united states some of her sexual violence hoax facts as the sword and flick inflicting them on the public and mr depp do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no two as to this statement appearing in the april 27 2020 online edition of the daily mail do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes that yeah has misheard proven this stuff was that was evident 100 question mr waldman while acting as an agent for mr depp made or published the statement answer yes question the statement was about ms heard answer yes question the statement was false answer yes do you find that ms heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by mr waldman was made with actual malice answer yes three as to this statement appearing in the april 27 daily mail quote the beginning of the end of miss herd's abuse hoax against johnny depp end quote do you find that ms heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer no as against john c depp ii we the jury award compensatory damages in the amount of two million dollars as against john c depp the second we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of zero dollars jamie damn that's enough that's enough money that she has that's your verdict and then circulated to miss predator in a united states court jackson's noted on it you legit say johnny wouldn't have won i i did not think johnny depp would have won this in the american court system the first amendment is profoundly important okay this has never happened in my opinion i i don't think this has ever happened we looked at famous instances of defamation uh we had we looked at famous instances of defamation suits in the united states of america there was only one instance where someone actually settled out of court but never actually won inside the courtroom no you missed the beginning it was 10 mil 5 mil 2 mil those are the ones i caught jiren during this trial holy [ __ ] when i wow wow yep so johnny depp won not only did he win he won in a triumphant fashion not a single thing when amber's way none not a single one at least none that i caught granted i'm a little late but none that i caught over the last like 30 minutes it was johnny all [ __ ] day they there was nothing in amber's side holy [ __ ] i know i i know i'm late it's been storming i wasn't gonna stream during a storm because i figured it's just gonna take the power out but the second i started seeing i mean i live in tampa okay let me explain so i was gonna stream today because i figured today would probably be the last day but it's been storming all morning like a big storm and in florida we basically keep like all of our infrastructure just outside in the open air so when it rains like even just a light drizzle power just goes out like if someone drinks water too close to you know the electric company it'll take out the power for the whole city so i figured there's no point in streaming because it'll just take power out at some point but when i was watching this and it just started to be this cascade of dubs for johnny depp i couldn't help but hop on every single one of them went to johnny depp it was nothing but yeses across the board that was [ __ ] wild the only word for the turd today was no on her side of things they declined all of her [ __ ] now i may have missed something in between starting stream and stopping watching here but i'm pretty sure it was 13 million dollars to johnny depp in total zero to amber it was 15 million it was 15 million to johnny and two to amber okay that's [ __ ] wild what did she get money for i don't know i must have missed that one in between starting stream and stopping watching so someone's gonna have to tell me the turd got flushed this was such a wash so from what i'm understanding the reason they awarded amber the the two million is because of waldman right is that what it was amber proved that someone representing depp made false claims and tried to use it to defame her is that was that the waldman thing there were so many people here so many characters in this i can't remember i mean that two million dollars is nothing because now she owes 13 million to johnny depp so she still profited negative 13 from the trial johnny won 80 of this he won 90 of this it seems the only thing was the waldman statements which awarded amber a little bit yeah johnny won and it wasn't even close there's a 350k cap what does that mean i've seen a couple people say that what is the 350k cap 15 mil plus 350k in reimbursement you can only pay out 350k under virginia law for defamation so what does that mean then so when they say we the jury award in punitive damages to death 10 million they can only pay out 350k of that oh he won 10 million for the damages done to his career and 350k for the definition defamation statements ah okay so 350k of the five million of punitive damages okay so yeah he won 10.35 mil it would be minus two mil winning money was probably the least of his concerns he just wanted to clear his name in the public eye which he did like triumphantly you see asmin got 4k subs in five minutes oh yeah asmin was getting because i was watching it a little bit and i turned on asman stream asman is getting like uh subs as if they were supporting johnny depp by subbing to him it was really [ __ ] cute amber posted on twitter is it like a sad face because god damn disappointment i feel today is beyond words heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power influence and sway of my ex oh my god this is this is tragic to read the mountain of evidence which was multiple times debunked questioned and proven to be inaccurate yikes yeah i just saw the amber heard tweet that's absolutely pre-written but it's also very uh yucky she's still trying to make it seem like it was an attack against women that no one will believe women which i think is couldn't be further from the truth
Up Next

Layers of the Atmosphere: Temperature and Pressure Explained
@MooMooMath
165.9K views•2019-11-19

IFS Therapy Demonstration: Complete Session with Unburdening
@IFSCA
95.9K views•2021-01-13

FastAPI vs Flask vs Django: Choosing the Right Python Web Framework
@TechWithTim
302.5K views•2024-05-26

Game of Thrones Opening Credits: A Cinematic Analysis
@gameofthrones
46.3M views•2011-04-18
Related Study Plans & Knowledge Roadmaps
Structured learning paths in General & Interdisciplinary Studies







































![[FULL STORY] How did you “break the cycle” in your family?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qTmFSGiibXs/maxresdefault.jpg)