Recent peer-reviewed scientific papers confirm that astrophysical jets from active galactic nuclei contain large-scale electric currents flowing away from galactic nuclei, supporting the Electric Universe interpretation that these jets are fundamentally electromagnetic structures (Birkeland currents) rather than purely gravitational phenomena, as magnetic fields are caused exclusively by moving electric charges.
Cosmic Electric Currents in AGN Jets: Dr. Donald Scott Analysis
Added:Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe, brought to you by The Thunderbolts Project™ at Thunderbolts.info In recent years, a profound development has been unfolding in astrophysics, the inevitable acknowledgement of tremendous electric currents at the largest cosmic scales.
One of the most stupendous electromagnetic cosmic phenomena is the collimated, light years long, jets produced at active galactic nuclei.
Recently, the obvious electrical nature of these jets has been explored in scientific papers published in peer-reviewed journals.
One such paper entitled "The jets of active galactic nuclei as giant coaxial cables" summarizes, "...our results have now yielded firm evidence that many ― possibly all ― active galactic nuclei jets have inward currents along their axes and outward currents in a more extended region surrounding the jets.... It also indicates that astrophysical jets are fundamentally electromagnetic structures..." Another paper entitled "Electric Currents along Astrophysical Jets" also argues for cosmic-scale electric currents though also doing so from the framework of gravitational theory.
The author states, "Several researchers have reported direct evidence for large-scale electric currents along astrophysical jets.
Quite unexpectedly, their directions are not random as would have been the case if the magnetic field were generated by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo.
Instead, in all kiloparsec-scale detections, the inferred electric currents are found to flow away from the galactic nucleus.
This unexpected break of symmetry suggests that a battery mechanism is operating around the central black hole."
And here we see emphasized the fundamental differences between Standard Astrophysical Theory and Plasma Cosmology and the Electric Universe.
Astrophysicists can only imagine colossal gravity, a black hole, producing tremendous magnetism which then produces the stupendous electric currents.
In this episode, retired professor of electrical engineering, Donald Scott, offers the Electric Universe interpretation, first addressing a basic problem in cosmology: what is the real source of magnetism in space?
We have to realize that magnetic fields are caused by one thing and one thing only.
That's the movement of charge, in other words, electric currents.
Electric currents create magnetic fields and when magnetic fields collide with conductors, then currents will be induced, that is to say initiated, created in those conductors.
You can't have one without the other.
But anyway, they've been very reluctant to mention electric currents until very, very recently, when they do, indeed, mention electric currents.
So, one was "Electric Currents along Astrophysical Jets" by Ioannis Contopoulos.
When I saw this, I went, "Wow, electric currents and jets, that sounds just like Birkeland currents!"
Until you begin to read the article, and I do admit they do mention electric currents, so that's, that's two points to remember and that's good.
But I think it's the first sentence in the article, "Astrophysical black holes and their surrounding accretion disks are believed to be threaded by grand design helical magnetic fields.
There is strong theoretical evidence."
Now, I don't know what "strong theoretical evidence" means.
There's either strong observational evidence or a well-believed theory but there's no such thing as "strong theoretical evidence."
"But the main driver of their winds and jets is the Lorentz force generated by these fields and their associated electric currents."
That's good.
The Lorentz forces certainly are at play in Birkeland currents.
Then they go on and said, "Several researchers have reported direct evidence for large-scale electric currents along astrophysical jets."
Good!
"Quite unexpectedly, their directions are not random as would have been the case if the magnetic field were generated by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo."
Oh, oh, there we go again, dynamos.
If you look up the definition of dynamo in Wikipedia, and I did it just to be sure I was right.
The dynamo is an electrical generator that produces direct current.
In other words, it's a DC generator.
It's a way Edison made DC current in Chicago, I think it was.
But that has nothing to do, really, with what's going on in space.
I don't think we really have any use for dynamos and what they use this word, almost like a magic Shibboleth that it's a dynamo caused it.
Anyway, "Magnetic fields are an important constituent of cosmic plasmas at all astrophysical scales.
They are thought to be produced by 'seed' fields generated by random currents that are amplified by dynamo action in planetary and stellar interiors, accretion disks and generally rotating astrophysical plasmas."
I mean, other than the fact that they mentioned astrophysical plasma, everything there is wrong or non-existent.
There's no such thing as accretion disk, they like to think about.
It's well-known that Tony Peratt said that in the Los Alamos laboratory, they would try to simulate an accretion disk and totally failed, miserably.
They couldn't do it and if they mixed plasma in with their simulation and allowed for Maxwell's equations to be used as well, then yes, you could get the thing to accrete.
But without plasma, without electricity, there's no such thing as a magnetic accretion disk.
But anyway, there's another paper which I think is less obviously wrong in many of its points but still has some things to worry about.
That one is "The jets of AGMs (active galactic nuclei) as giant coaxial cables."
This paper was written by Denise C. Gabuzda and her associate authors Nagle and Roche in the Department of Physics at the University College Cork, Ireland.
And the first sentence in that paper is, "Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) release vast amounts of energy, whose ultimate source is a supermassive black hole in the galactic nucleus.
In so-called radio-loud AGNs..." Remember that radio-loud, that's important.
"Radio loud AGNs, two relativistic jets of plasma emanate from the nucleus, presumably along the rotational axis of the black hole."
In other words, they can't let go of black holes and gravity and all this other nonsense, when the evidence is right in front of their face!
She says, radio-loud AGNs.
What makes loud radio noise?
Answer ― double layers.
That's been well known for decades since Hannes Alfven won the Nobel Prize in 1970.
Let me just conclude by saying, in the end of that paper by Gabuzda, her Figure 2 is almost an identical figure to one that I published in my paper in "Progress In Physics" in 2015.
It's a cross section of the Birkeland current.
It shows counter-rotating currents and magnetic fields and that's indeed true.
So if she gets it that right, why can't she let go of the supermassive black holes?
There's no excuse for anyone with any claim to being an investigator of cosmic phenomena as not to know about the seminal prizable work of people like C.E.R. Bruce, Ralph Juergens, Earl Milton, Wal Thornhill, Tony Peratt, Hannes Alfven, Birkeland, and many others.
These people have staked out their rightful claims years ago and it's shameful that their work is being ignored as if they never had lived and worked for years to promote these concepts.
For continuous updates on Space News from the Electric Universe, stay tuned to Thunderbolts.info
Up Next

Gravitational Lensing Explained: Galaxies, Quasars, and the Hubble Constant
@howfarawayisit
98K views•2023-06-07

Directly Imaging Habitable Planets at Alpha Centauri | SETI Talk
@SETIInstitute
36.1K views•2015-10-26

Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion Explained (Educational Astronomy Video)
@Peekaboo_Kidz
404.9K views•2023-02-17

Gamma-Ray Bursts: Cosmic Snipers Explained | Astronomy
@kurzgesagt
15M views•2016-07-31
Related Study Plans & Knowledge Roadmaps
Structured learning paths in Astronomy















![The Dark Energy Mystery [4K]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/cQyoYzHxdvo/maxresdefault.webp)























