De-risking vs Decoupling: China's Economic Strategy Explained

Added:

De-risking shift
Chip tensions

De-risking shift

0:00
Playing Section
  • 1

    US and EU shift rhetoric to de-risking, not decoupling.

  • 2

    Strategy reduces dependence while managing China risks.

  • 3

    Economic de-risking broadens trade tools and sectors.

The fundamentals of globalization and how global supply chains operate across borders.
The history of US-China trade relations, including the 2018 trade war and tariff implementations.
The concept of economic interdependence and how trade can be used as geopolitical leverage.
Basic macroeconomic indicators and trade terms, such as trade deficits, foreign direct investment (FDI), and intellectual property.
The strategic implementation of 'friendshoring', 'nearshoring', and 'reshoring' in supply chain management.
Export controls, sanctions, and restrictions on dual-use technologies, such as the US CHIPS and Science Act.
China's economic retaliation strategies, including export restrictions on critical raw materials like gallium and germanium.
How middle-power nations (e.g., EU member states, ASEAN countries) navigate the economic pressures of choosing between Western and Chinese markets.
4.6K views39likes3:29@businessstandardOriginal Release: 2023-06-08

De-risking is a strategic approach in international relations where countries reduce their economic dependence on another nation (particularly China) by diversifying supply chains, developing domestic industries, and using trade instruments, without completely severing economic ties; this differs from decoupling, which implies a total separation of economic relationships. The G7 nations, including the US and EU, have adopted 'de-risking' as a moderate alternative to 'decoupling' to manage trade tensions while maintaining beneficial economic connections, though China views this terminology as essentially decoupling in disguise.