Can Lebanon Disarm Hezbollah? Sovereignty vs. State Within a State

Added:

Hezbollah's Rise
Lebanon's Fractured State
Iran's Proxy Threat
Strategic Setbacks
Disarmament Dilemma
Balancing Risks

Hezbollah's Rise

0:00
Playing Section
  • 1

    Explores Hezbollah's origins as an Iranian-backed militia in Lebanon.

  • 2

    Details its growth into a powerful political and military force.

  • 3

    Sets the stage for the current disarmament dilemma.

The history of the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1990) and the Taif Agreement, which led to the disarmament of most Lebanese militias except Hezbollah.
The concept of 'confessionalism' in Lebanon's political system, which distributes political representation and power along sectarian lines.
The origins of Hezbollah in the early 1980s as a Shiite paramilitary movement funded and trained by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The basic political science definition of state sovereignty, particularly Max Weber's concept of the state's monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force.
The legal framework and implementation challenges of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which calls for the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon.
The economic and governance crises in Lebanon, analyzing how the dual-power structure affects international aid, sovereignty, and state collapse.
Comparative politics studies of other hybrid security actors globally, such as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq or the Houthis in Yemen.
Future strategic scenarios for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the feasibility of a national defense strategy that integrates or neutralizes paramilitary forces.
88.5K views3.6Klikes12:22@JamesKerLindsayOriginal Release: 2025-08-22

This video explores how Lebanon confronts the challenge of disarming Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed militia that has functioned as a 'state within a state' for over 40 years. The analysis examines how Hezbollah emerged during the Lebanese Civil War with Iranian support, grew into a dominant political and military force, and now faces potential disarmament amid weakened conditions following recent conflicts. The content illustrates the broader challenge of removing armed non-state actors from weak or divided states, where such groups often provide essential services and maintain strong community support, making disarmament both necessary for state sovereignty and potentially destabilizing if not carefully managed.