Syntax 7.5: Affix Hopping in TP, ProgP, PerfP & VoiceP

Added:

TP Structure
Affix Hopping
Apply to Perfects
Progressive Affix
Passive Voice
Complex Sentence

TP Structure

0:00
Playing Section
  • 1

    Explains TP in X-bar format, with subjects in specifier and auxiliaries/modals in T head.

  • 2

    Notes alternative names like IP and AgrP for TP across syntactic literature.

Basic X-bar Theory: Understanding the universal phrase structure schema (Heads, Complements, and Specifiers) as applied to lexical categories.
Structure of the Tense Phrase (TP): Familiarity with the basic clause structure where Tense (T) projects to a TP and hosts modal auxiliaries or abstract tense features.
Lexical vs. Functional Categories: Understanding the distinction between content words (like verbs in VP) and functional morphemes (like tense, aspect, and voice).
English Verbal Morphology: Basic awareness of grammatical aspect (Progressive '-ing' and Perfective '-en') and passive voice, and how they relate to auxiliary verbs ('be' and 'have').
Head-to-Head Movement (V-to-T): Studying how languages like French differ from English by raising the lexical verb to the Tense head syntactically, rather than lowering the affix.
Do-Support in English: Analyzing how English saves a sentence when Affix Hopping is blocked by syntactic interveners like negation ('not') or during Subject-Auxiliary Inversion.
The Split-INFL Hypothesis: Exploring more advanced syntactic frameworks that decompose TP into separate functional projections like Agreement Phrase (AgrP) and Tense Phrase (TP).
DP Movement and Case Theory: Investigating how the subject DP moves from its thematic origin inside the verb phrase (Spec-vP/Spec-VP) to the Spec-TP position to check Nominative Case.
7.8K views126likes12:36@CarnieSyntaxthEditionOriginal Release: 2020-09-01

In generative syntax, the affix hopping rule explains how inflectional affixes (like -ed, -ing, -en) generated in functional categories (T, PerfP, ProgP, VoiceP) move down to attach to the main verb, accounting for the interleaving patterns observed in complex sentences with multiple grammatical markers such as tense, perfective, progressive, and passive constructions.