Danto's Artworld Theory: Redefining Art Through Institutional Context

Added:

Danto's Theory
Imitation Flaws
Modern Shift

Danto's Theory

0:00
Playing Section
  • 1

    Danto rejects object-based properties for defining art.

  • 2

    He proposes art is defined by its role in human institutions.

  • 3

    The 'art world' concept is central to his framework.

The Mimetic Theory of Art: Understanding traditional definitions of art based on representation, imitation (mimesis), and physical beauty, dating back to Plato and Aristotle.
The Dada Movement and Duchamp's Readymades: Familiarity with how Marcel Duchamp's 'Fountain' challenged traditional aesthetic values and forced a paradigm shift in defining art.
The Distinction between Aesthetic and Artistic Properties: Grasping how an object's sensory properties (how it looks) differ from its artistic meaning and historical significance.
Basic Concepts in Aesthetics: Familiarity with the foundational philosophical question 'What is art?' and the limits of purely formalist definitions.
George Dickie's Institutional Theory of Art: Exploring Dickie's formalization of Danto's ideas, specifically how the 'artworld' confers the status of candidate for appreciation.
Arthur Danto's 'The End of Art' Thesis: Examining Danto's philosophical claim that art history, as a progressive narrative of self-definition, reached its end with Andy Warhol's Brillo Boxes.
Critiques of Institutionalism: Analyzing major objections to the theory, including issues of circularity, institutional elitism, and its struggle to explain 'outsider' or 'indigenous' art.
Application to Contemporary Art: Investigating how the institutional theory applies to modern artistic phenomena like street art (e.g., Banksy), conceptual art, and digital assets like NFTs.
5.3K views83likes4:58@andrewknoll8403Original Release: 2020-11-09

Arthur Danto argues that art cannot be defined by inherent properties of objects themselves (such as imitation, as proposed by Plato), but rather by whether something fulfills a specific role within the 'art world'—a human-made institution including museums, critics, and art historians—that confers artistic status on objects through social and institutional context rather than intrinsic qualities.