Academic Databases
Explore Our Semantic Databases
STEM & Tech
Math, Physics, CS & Engineering...
Economics
Macro, Micro, Econometrics...
Business
Management, Marketing, Finance...
Health & Life Sciences
Biology, Medicine, Neuroscience...
Humanities & Social Sciences
Psychology, Law, Philosophy, History...
General Studies
General & interdisciplinary studies...
Explore Topics
Features

Cauchy Integral Formula - Complex Integration | Engineering Math | KTU S3 Module 3

Added: 2026-08-07

Deep Dive

Basic understanding of complex numbers, analytic functions, and the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Complex Analysis L06: Analytic Functions and Cauchy-Riemann Conditions

Complex Analysis L06: Analytic Functions and Cauchy-Riemann Conditions

97.3K

For a function f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y) to be analytic, the derivative must be the same regardless of approach direction. By equating the directional derivatives from the real axis (partial u/partial x + i partial v/partial x) and the imaginary axis (partial v/partial y - i partial u/partial y), we derive the Cauchy-Riemann conditions: partial u/partial x = partial v/partial y and partial u/partial y = -partial v/partial x. These conditions ensure the derivative exists and is well-defined for any path delta z → 0.

Click to watch →

Analytic Function (Lecture-1) (Cauchy-Reimann Equation) or (C.R.Equation) (Complex Analysis)

Analytic Function (Lecture-1) (Cauchy-Reimann Equation) or (C.R.Equation) (Complex Analysis)

5.2K

An analytic function (also called regular or holomorphic function) is a complex-valued function that is differentiable at every point in its domain. For a function to be analytic, it must satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations: ∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y and ∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x, where f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y). These equations are necessary conditions for a function to be analytic. The function must be single-valued and differentiable at every point in its domain.

Click to watch →

Unit-3 Analytics Functions - Mathematics

Unit-3 Analytics Functions - Mathematics

13.4K

Complex numbers are expressed as z = a + bi where a and b are real numbers and i² = -1. A complex-valued function maps complex numbers to complex numbers, expressed as f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y) where z = x + iy. Functions can be single-valued (one output per input) or multi-valued (multiple outputs per input). Continuity requires the limit of f(z) as z approaches z₀ equals f(z₀). Differentiability requires the limit of [f(z₀ + Δz) - f(z₀)]/Δz to exist as Δz approaches zero. A function is analytic at a point if it is differentiable at that point and in some neighborhood around it. The Cauchy-Riemann equations (u_x = v_y and u_y = -v_x) are necessary conditions for analyticity, derived by computing the derivative along real and imaginary axes and equating results.

Click to watch →

Lec 1 | Complex Variable (Differentiation) Mathematics 2 (M-2) AKU B.Tech 1st Year 2nd Sem

Lec 1 | Complex Variable (Differentiation) Mathematics 2 (M-2) AKU B.Tech 1st Year 2nd Sem

3.9K

The Cauchy-Riemann equations are necessary conditions for a complex function to be differentiable (analytic). For f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) to be analytic, it must satisfy ∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y and ∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x. Functions satisfying these equations are called analytic or holomorphic functions. They have important properties including being infinitely differentiable and having power series expansions. Examples include polynomials, exponential functions, and trigonometric functions defined on complex numbers.

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis 6: Cauchy-Riemann Equations Explained

Complex Analysis 6: Cauchy-Riemann Equations Explained

The Cauchy-Riemann equations are two partial differential equations (∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y and ∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x) that must be satisfied by the real and imaginary parts u(x,y) and v(x,y) of a complex function f(z) = u + iv for it to be complex differentiable (holomorphic) at a point. These equations arise from the requirement that the Jacobian matrix of the corresponding real function f: ℝ²→ℝ² must represent complex multiplication, which imposes the specific symmetric structure [[a, -b], [b, a]] on the matrix, thereby connecting the two notions of differentiability in complex and real analysis.

Click to watch →

Deep Dive

Concept of contour integration (line integrals in the complex plane) and parametrization of curves.

Complex Analysis 07: Contour Integration

Complex Analysis 07: Contour Integration

73K

Contour integration extends real line integrals to the complex plane by defining the integral of f(z) along a curve gamma as ∫ₐᵇ f(γ(t))γ'(t)dt. Unlike real integrals that follow the real line automatically, complex contour integrals require explicit parameterization of the path. For straight lines from z₀ to z₁, use γ(t) = z₀ + t(z₁ - z₀) with t ∈ [0,1]. The integral of z dz along such paths evaluates to (-5 + 15i) for the example from 5 to 2+3i, demonstrating how complex integrals reduce to ordinary real integrals with complex coefficients.

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis: what is a contour integral?

Complex Analysis: what is a contour integral?

58.3K

Contour integration extends real-variable calculus to the complex plane, working with two-dimensional curves. A curve gamma in the complex plane is defined as a continuously differentiable (C¹) mapping from a real interval [A,B] to the complex plane, ensuring both real and imaginary parts have continuous first derivatives. These smooth curves are called contours. Integration along contours requires parameterizing z = gamma(t), leading to dz = gamma'(t)dt. The contour integral ∫_γ f(z)dz transforms into the real integral ∫_A^B f(gamma(t))gamma'(t)dt. For example, integrating 1/z over the unit circle parameterized by e^(iθ) yields 2πi, demonstrating how complex integrals compute.

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis | Marathon Series| Most Repeated Questions for CSIR NET, CUET & IIT JAM | By GP Sir

Complex Analysis | Marathon Series| Most Repeated Questions for CSIR NET, CUET & IIT JAM | By GP Sir

36.8K

To evaluate a contour integral ∫_C f(z) dz, parametrize the curve C by z(t) for a ≤ t ≤ b, then dz = z'(t) dt. For the integral ∫_C (z² + 2iz)/(z² + 2iz) dz where C is the line segment from (0,0) to (1,1), parametrize as z(t) = t + it for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, so dz = (1 + i) dt. Then z² + 2iz = (t + it)² + 2i(t + it) = t² - t² + 2it² + 2it - 2t = 2it² + 2it - 2t. The integrand simplifies to 1, so the integral is ∫₀¹ (1 + i) dt = 1 + i.

Click to watch →

Everything YOU Need to Know for Contour Integration (Parts 1-4)

Everything YOU Need to Know for Contour Integration (Parts 1-4)

7.5K

Parameterization converts complex contour integrals into real integrals. For straight lines from z₁ to z₂, let z = z₁ + t(z₂-z₁) with t ∈ [0,1]. For circular arcs, use z = z₀ + Re^{iθ} with θ ∈ [0,π]. For example, integrating from 0 to e^(2πi/3)·R uses z = x·e^(2πi/3) with x from 0 to R. This technique transforms complex integrals into manageable real integrals that can be evaluated using standard calculus techniques.

Click to watch →

16 Integrales de contorno

16 Integrales de contorno

22.4K

Contour integrals extend line integrals from vector calculus to the complex plane. The integral ∫_γ f(z) dz represents integrating a complex function along a curve gamma from initial point z₁ to final point z₂. For closed curves, notation ∮_γ f(z) dz is used with positive orientation. To evaluate by definition: (1) Parametrize gamma as z(t) = x(t) + iy(t) for t in [a,b]; (2) Substitute into f(z); (3) Multiply by dz/dt; (4) Integrate with respect to t. Examples include ∫_γ z̄ dz = 1 for line segment from 0 to 1+i, and ∫_γ (1/z) dz = 2πi for circle |z| = r. Properties include linearity, orientation reversal, and additivity for piecewise curves.

Click to watch →

Deep Dive

Cauchy's Integral Theorem (Cauchy-Goursat Theorem) for analytic functions on simply connected domains.

Cauchy Goursat Theorem or Cauchy Integral Theorem

Cauchy Goursat Theorem or Cauchy Integral Theorem

120

A domain D is simply connected if every loop in D can be continuously deformed to a point within D, meaning the domain has no holes. Cauchy's Integral Theorem states that if a function f is analytic in a simply connected domain D, then for every simple closed contour C in D, the integral ∮f(z)dz = 0. The proof uses Green's Theorem: for f(z) = u + iv, the integral equals ∬(-∂v/∂x - ∂u/∂y) dA + i∬(∂u/∂x - ∂v/∂y) dA. Since f is analytic, the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold, making both double integrals zero. Examples include ∮(1/z)dz = 2πi on the unit circle (not analytic at z=0) and ∮(1/z²)dz = 0 on the unit circle (analytic except at z=0).

Click to watch →

The Cauchy-Goursat Theorem

The Cauchy-Goursat Theorem

65.3K

The Cauchy-Goursat theorem states that if a function f is analytic in a simply connected domain D, then for every simple closed contour C in D, the integral of f(z) along C equals zero. A simply connected domain is defined as an open, connected set where every simple closed contour can be continuously shrunk to a point without leaving the set. Regions with holes are classified as multiply connected: doubly connected for one hole, triply connected for two holes, etc. The theorem provides a powerful method to evaluate complex integrals without direct computation, requiring only verification of analyticity within and on the contour.

Click to watch →

[s3 | 2025] Математический анализ, Трифанова Е. С., лекция 15

[s3 | 2025] Математический анализ, Трифанова Е. С., лекция 15

183

If a function is analytic in a simply connected domain D (no holes), then the integral over any closed contour in D equals zero. This is a special case of Cauchy's Theorem. For domains with holes, the boundary consists of multiple curves: outer boundary oriented counterclockwise, inner boundaries oriented clockwise. The integral over the entire boundary equals zero.

Click to watch →

Cauchy Goursat Theorem || Cauchy Theorem || Simply Connected Doamins || Simple Closed Contours

Cauchy Goursat Theorem || Cauchy Theorem || Simply Connected Doamins || Simple Closed Contours

142

The Cauchy-Goursat Theorem states that if a function f(z) is analytic in a simply connected domain D, then the contour integral of f(z) over any simple closed curve C lying entirely within D is equal to zero; this theorem removes the requirement for the derivative of f to be continuous, which was a condition in Cauchy's original theorem, and extends to any simple closed contour where the function is analytic both on and within the contour.

Click to watch →

Mod-02 Lec-15 Cauchy Integral Theorem

Mod-02 Lec-15 Cauchy Integral Theorem

24.8K

A domain is simply connected if any simple closed curve within it can be continuously shrunk to a point without leaving the domain. Examples include the unit disk |z|<1 and right half-plane Re(z)>0. Domains with holes (like 1<|z|<2) are not simply connected because curves encircling holes cannot be contracted to a point. A domain is p-fold connected if its boundary consists of p disjoint closed sets. Cauchy's Integral Theorem states that if f(z) is analytic in a simply connected domain D, then ∮_C f(z)dz = 0 for any simple closed curve C in D. The proof uses Green's Theorem and the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Click to watch →

Cauchy's Integral Formula

Evaluating Complex Integrals

Poles Inside Contour

Applying Derivative Formula

Higher-Order Poles

Multiple Singualarities

Complex Fraction Decomposition

Combining Integral Results

Derivative and Final Value

Classifying Singularities

Cauchy's Integral Formula

0:00

Playing Section

1
Introduction to Cauchy's integral formula for a point inside a contour.
2
Explains the formula for higher-order derivatives using factorial terms.
3
Discusses the condition for a point lying inside or outside the contour.

Deep Dive

Cauchy's Integral Formula for Derivatives, to evaluate higher-order derivatives of analytic functions.

Cauchy's Integral formula for higher order Derivative and example

Cauchy's Integral formula for higher order Derivative and example

292

Cauchy's Integral Formula for higher order derivatives states that if f(z) is analytic inside and on a closed contour C, and a is any point inside C, then the nth derivative of f at a is given by f^(n)(a) = n!/(2πi) ∮_C f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz, where n is a positive integer. This formula allows computation of derivatives of analytic functions through contour integration.

Click to watch →

Cauchy's theorem

Cauchy's theorem

118

Cauchy's Integral Formula for higher derivatives states: ∮_C f(z)/(z - z₀)^(n+1) dz = (2πi/n!) f^(n)(z₀), where f^(n)(z₀) is the nth derivative of f at z₀. This formula generalizes the basic Cauchy's Integral Formula to compute derivatives of analytic functions through contour integration. The formula is derived by differentiating the basic formula with respect to z₀.

Click to watch →

Դաս 10 | Հետևանքներ Կոշիի բանաձևից | Կոմպլեքս անալիզ

Դաս 10 | Հետևանքներ Կոշիի բանաձևից | Կոմպլեքս անալիզ

197

The nth derivative of an analytic function f at a point a can be computed using the formula f^(n)(a) = (n! / 2πi) ∮_C f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz. This generalizes Cauchy's Integral Formula to derivatives of all orders, showing that analytic functions are infinitely differentiable. The derivative of the Cauchy integral formula can be computed by differentiating under the integral sign: if f is continuous, then the derivative of (1/2πi) ∮_C f(ζ)/(ζ-z) dζ with respect to z is (1/2πi) ∮_C f(ζ)/(ζ-z)^2 dζ, which equals f'(z).

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis - Cauchy's integral formula in Hindi (Lecture 6)

Complex Analysis - Cauchy's integral formula in Hindi (Lecture 6)

585K

By differentiating Cauchy's Integral Formula with respect to a, we derive higher-order formulas. The first derivative gives ∫_C f(z)/(z-a)² dz = 2πi f'(a). The second derivative gives ∫_C f(z)/(z-a)³ dz = 2πi f''(a)/2!. The third derivative gives ∫_C f(z)/(z-a)⁴ dz = 2πi f'''(a)/3!. The generalized formula states that for any positive integer n: ∫_C f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz = 2πi f^(n)(a)/n!, where f^(n)(a) is the nth derivative of f at point a. This allows evaluation of integrals with higher powers in the denominator.

Click to watch →

length of C#Cauchy's integral theorem# Cauchy's integral formula# simply& multiple connected region

length of C#Cauchy's integral theorem# Cauchy's integral formula# simply& multiple connected region

28.1K

This section presents Cauchy's Integral Formula and its applications. A domain is simply connected if every simple closed contour within it encloses only points of D. Cauchy's Integral Formula states that if f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple closed contour C taken in the positive (anti-clockwise) direction, and a is any point interior to C, then f(a) = (1/(2πi)) ∮_C f(z)/(z-a) dz. This formula allows evaluation of a function at an interior point using an integral over the boundary. By differentiating with respect to a, we obtain higher-order derivatives: f⁽ⁿ⁾(a) = (n!/(2πi)) ∮_C f(z)/(z-a)ⁿ⁺¹ dz. A point z₀ is a singular point if f(z) fails to be analytic at z₀ but is analytic at some point in every neighborhood of z₀.

Click to watch →

Deep Dive

Expansion of complex functions into Taylor and Laurent series around singular points.

КЧФ16. Приклади розвинення в ряд Лорана.

КЧФ16. Приклади розвинення в ряд Лорана.

484

This section covers two advanced Laurent series scenarios. First, expansion around the complex point z₀ = 1+i, where the distance to the singularity at z=1 is 1. Inside |z - (1+i)| < √2, the series reduces to a Taylor series with only positive powers. Outside, only negative powers appear. Second, expansion around the singularity z₀ = 2 for f(z) = 1/(z-3) - 1/(z-2). Inside |z-2| < 1, the series contains both principal part (-1/(z-2)) and analytic part. Outside |z-2| > 1, only negative powers remain. These examples demonstrate how Laurent series behavior depends on whether the expansion point is a regular point or a singularity, and how the geometric series formula adapts to different factoring strategies.

Click to watch →

Taylor & Laurent Theorem in Complex Analysis | CSIR NET & GATE Physics | Lec 14

Taylor & Laurent Theorem in Complex Analysis | CSIR NET & GATE Physics | Lec 14

476

Laurent series is a generalization of Taylor series that includes negative powers of (z-a). It is used for functions with singularities. The expansion is: f(z) = Σ (from n=-∞ to ∞) of a_n (z-a)^n. For example, f(z) = 1/z has Laurent series 1/z about z=0. For f(z) = 1/(z-1) + 1/z, the Laurent series about z=0 is: 1/z + 1 + z + z² + z³ + ... This includes both negative and positive powers, allowing representation of functions with singularities.

Click to watch →

[GIẢI TÍCH PHỨC] 12. CHUỖI LAURENT

[GIẢI TÍCH PHỨC] 12. CHUỖI LAURENT

18.3K

A Laurent series is an infinite series ∑(n=-∞ to ∞) C_n(z-z₀)^n with complex coefficients C_n and integer n. Laurent's Theorem states that any function analytic on an annulus (region between two concentric circles) can be uniquely expressed as a Laurent series. The coefficients are given by C_n = (1/(2πi)) ∮_γ f(z)/(z-z₀)^(n+1) dz. For rational functions, partial fraction decomposition is the first step. For f(z) = 1/((z-1)(z+2)), expanding around z₀ = 1 gives (1/3)(z-1)^(-1) - (1/3)∑(n=0 to ∞) (-1)^n (z-1)^n / 3^n, converging on 0 < |z-1| < 3. Expanding around z₀ = -2 gives (1/3)(z+2)^(-1) - (1/3)∑(n=0 to ∞) (z+2)^n / 3^n, converging on 0 < |z+2| < 3.

Click to watch →

Serie de Laurent I Ejemplo 3

Serie de Laurent I Ejemplo 3

10K

A Laurent series is a power series expansion that includes both positive and negative powers of (z - z₀), used to represent complex functions that are not analytic at a point z₀. For the function f(z) = (z⁶ + z⁵ + 2z² + 6)/z, the Laurent series around z = 0 is obtained by dividing each term by z, resulting in 6/z⁸ + 2/z⁶ + 1/z³ + 1/z². The coefficients are aₙ = 6 for n = -8, aₙ = 2 for n = -6, aₙ = 1 for n = -3 and n = -2, and aₙ = 0 for all other n. The residue at z = 0 is the coefficient of the 1/z term, which is 0 in this case.

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis - Laurent & Taylor Series of Complex functions (Problems) in hindi (Lecture 9)

Complex Analysis - Laurent & Taylor Series of Complex functions (Problems) in hindi (Lecture 9)

390.2K

Laurent series expands complex functions in annular regions (strips between two concentric circles) using both positive and negative powers of z, while Taylor series expands around a specific point z=a using only non-negative powers; the expansion method depends on the region of convergence, where terms with denominators smaller than the region's radius are factored out to enable geometric series expansion.

Click to watch →

Deep Dive

The Residue Theorem, which generalizes the Cauchy Integral Formula for multiple singularities inside a contour.

Mod-1 Lec-8 Residue Theorem

Mod-1 Lec-8 Residue Theorem

37.8K

The residue theorem extends the single-singularity case to functions with multiple isolated singularities inside a contour. When f is analytic on a simple closed contour C except at a finite number of isolated singularities J1, J2, ..., Jk inside C, the integral equals 2πi times the sum of residues at all these points. The requirement of finite isolated singularities is essential because non-finite singularities would not remain isolated. This generalization allows evaluation of integrals for functions with multiple singularities by summing their individual residues.

Click to watch →

НИЯУ МИФИ | Теляковский Д.С. - Теория функций комплексного переменного | Лекция №15 | 4 семестр

НИЯУ МИФИ | Теляковский Д.С. - Теория функций комплексного переменного | Лекция №15 | 4 семестр

867

Cauchy's Residue Theorem states that for a function f(z) holomorphic inside and on a simple closed contour γ, except for a finite number of isolated singular points a_1, ..., a_n inside γ, the integral equals 2πi times the sum of residues at these points: ∮_γ f(z) dz = 2πi Σ Res(f, a_k). This generalizes Cauchy's integral formula to functions with singularities.

Click to watch →

AKTU BTech 1st Year Engg Maths 2 🔥 Unit 5 Complex Variable Integration | Top 20 Questions #maths2

AKTU BTech 1st Year Engg Maths 2 🔥 Unit 5 Complex Variable Integration | Top 20 Questions #maths2

100

When a contour encloses multiple singularities, the integral equals 2πi times the sum of residues at all enclosed singularities. For f(z) = e^(iz)/(z^2 + 1) with singularities at z = i and z = -i, we compute residues at each point. The residue at z = i is lim(z→i) (z-i) × f(z) = e^(-1)/(2i). The residue at z = -i is lim(z→-i) (z+i) × f(z) = e^(-1)/(-2i). Summing these gives 0, so the integral equals 0.

Click to watch →

Residue Theorem and Proof

Residue Theorem and Proof

140.1K

The general form of the residue theorem states that for a complex function f(z) with multiple singular points enclosed by a closed contour C, the contour integral ∮_C f(z)dz equals 2πi multiplied by the sum of all residues at the enclosed singular points. This applies regardless of how many singular points are enclosed, whether three or more. The theorem provides a powerful method for evaluating complex integrals by reducing them to algebraic sums of residues rather than computing difficult path integrals directly.

Click to watch →

Residue Theorem | Cauchy Integral Formula

Residue Theorem | Cauchy Integral Formula

100

The Residue Theorem states that the integral of a complex function around a closed contour equals 2πi times the sum of residues at all singularities enclosed by the contour. A residue is the coefficient of the 1/(z-a) term in the Laurent series expansion of a function at a singularity. For simple poles (order 1), multiply the function by (z-a) and take the limit as z approaches a. For poles of order m, multiply by (z-a)^m, take the (m-1)th derivative, and take the limit. If a function is analytic at a point, its residue is zero.

Click to watch →

Deep Dive

Application of contour integration and residue calculus to evaluate challenging real definite integrals.

Complex Analysis- Contour Integration | Application of Residue Theorem

Complex Analysis- Contour Integration | Application of Residue Theorem

830.7K

This video explains how to evaluate real definite integrals using contour integration and the residue theorem. The key steps involve substituting z = e^(iθ) to convert the integral into a complex contour integral over the unit circle |z|=1, finding the poles of the resulting rational function, determining which poles lie inside the unit circle, calculating the residues at those poles, and applying the residue theorem to obtain the final result. The method is demonstrated through three examples: ∫₀²π dθ/(a + b cosθ) = 2π/(a² - b²) for a > b > 0, ∫₀²π dθ/(1 + a² - 2a cosθ) = 2π(1 - a²) for |a| < 1, and ∫₀²π dθ/[5 - sin³(3θ)] = 5π/32.

Click to watch →

Complex Analysis- Contour Integration | Application of Residue Theorem Lecture 4| Belief physics

Complex Analysis- Contour Integration | Application of Residue Theorem Lecture 4| Belief physics

528

This lecture demonstrates how to evaluate real definite integrals using contour integration and the residue theorem. The first example proves that ∫₀^(π/2) log(sin(x))dx = ∫₀^(π/2) log(cos(x))dx = -π/2 log(2) by using the property f(a-x) = f(x) and logarithm properties. The second example evaluates ∫₀^(π/2) cos^(2n)(θ)sin^(2n-1)(θ)dθ by substituting z = e^(iθ) to convert it to a contour integral over the unit circle, then applying the residue theorem to find the residue at z = -1, which equals (2n choose n), ultimately proving the integral equals (2n-1)!!/(2n)!! × π/2.

Click to watch →

Contour Integration of Improper Integrals - Around Semi Circle -Residue Theorem

Contour Integration of Improper Integrals - Around Semi Circle -Residue Theorem

501

This comprehensive segment covers the entire methodology for evaluating real definite integrals using contour integration and the residue theorem. The process involves: (1) Transforming the real integral into a complex integral by replacing x with z, (2) Constructing a closed contour consisting of the real axis from -R to +R and a semicircle CR in the upper half-plane, (3) Identifying all poles of the complex function by equating the denominator to zero, (4) Determining which poles lie inside the chosen contour, (5) Calculating residues at simple poles using Res(f, z₀) = lim(z→z₀) [(z - z₀)f(z)], (6) Calculating residues at higher-order poles using Res(f, z₀) = (1/(m-1)!) lim(z→z₀) [d^(m-1)/dz^(m-1) ((z - z₀)^m f(z))], (7) Applying the residue theorem ∮_C f(z) dz = 2πi × Σ Res(f, z_k), (8) Showing the semicircle integral vanishes as R → ∞ by estimating its magnitude. For the function f(z) = 1/[(z²+9)(z²+4)²], the poles are z = ±3i (simple) and z = ±2i (order 2), with interior poles z = +3i and z = +2i. The final result is ∫_{-∞}^{+∞} f(x) dx = 7π/1200.

Click to watch →

UPSC Mathematics | Complex Analysis | Complex Integration

UPSC Mathematics | Complex Analysis | Complex Integration

347

This extensive segment covers residue theory and its applications to evaluating real definite integrals. It begins with the definition of residues as coefficients of (z - a)^(-1) in Laurent series expansions around isolated singularities. The segment covers calculating residues at simple poles using the formula Res(f, a) = lim(z→a) (z - a)f(z), and at higher-order poles using the general formula involving derivatives. The instructor demonstrates these calculations with detailed examples including f(z) = z²/(z² + a²) and f(z) = 1/(z^4 + 1). The segment then teaches the powerful technique of using contour integration to evaluate real definite integrals of the form ∫₀^(2π) R(cos θ, sin θ) dθ, demonstrating this with the integral ∫₀^(2π) dθ/(a + b cos θ) and showing how to find poles, determine which lie inside the unit circle, and apply the residue theorem to obtain the final result π/√(a² - b²).

Click to watch →

Evaluation of real definite integral by contour integration|Contour Integration|Part-2|Barun Maths|

Evaluation of real definite integral by contour integration|Contour Integration|Part-2|Barun Maths|

10.3K

To evaluate real definite integrals using contour integration, convert the integral to complex form using Euler's formula (e.g., cos(θ) = (e^(iθ) + e^(-iθ))/2), identify poles inside the contour, calculate residues at these poles, and apply the Residue Theorem (∮f(z)dz = 2πi × sum of residues inside the contour), then take the real part of the result to obtain the final answer.

Click to watch →

Cauchy's Integral Formula

Evaluating Complex Integrals

Poles Inside Contour

Applying Derivative Formula

Higher-Order Poles

Multiple Singualarities

Complex Fraction Decomposition

Combining Integral Results

Derivative and Final Value

Classifying Singularities

Cauchy's Integral Formula

0:00

Playing Section

1
Introduction to Cauchy's integral formula for a point inside a contour.
2
Explains the formula for higher-order derivatives using factorial terms.
3
Discusses the condition for a point lying inside or outside the contour.

108.7K views1.7K38:06@RVSMathsAcademyOriginal Release: 2020-12-01

The Cauchy Integral Formula states that for a function f(z) analytic inside and on a simple closed contour C, and a point a inside C, the integral ∮_C f(z)/(z-a) dz equals 2πi times f(a). If a lies outside C, the integral equals zero. The generalized formula for derivatives states that the nth derivative of f at a is given by f^(n)(a) = n!/(2πi) ∮_C f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz. This formula allows evaluation of complex contour integrals by simply evaluating the function at the point a, and is fundamental to complex analysis.

[00:00:00][Music] foreign foreign is equal to 2 pi i into f of a if a n minus 1 factorial into f n minus 1 dash of a if a lies inside c okay if a lies outside see any [Applause] minus a into a set minus b d c is equal to india over c a the point i know the ayah numerator equal to f is said by he said minus b is it minus b linearly is um e raised to is set by acid indu one minus you said the whole cube d is it where c is mode is it is equal to one by two where c is modulus of equal to one by two okay i'm gonna pretty much equal it equal to zero lies inside he said equal to one another in the point and that lies outside i have a number e formula over c e raised to is set by he said into one minus he said the whole cube d is it is equal to is it equal to one under the factory nano one minus i said the whole cubing factor numerator condition over c e raised to you said by one minus you said the whole cube numerator could be the whole by is it square plus one by d say where c is uh mode is it plus i is equal to one okay um formula nominated square plus one to zero or mm is that square is equal to minus one is it equal to plus or minus identity either you said square plus one in english splitting under them i said plus i into is it minus i n splitting is to is set by is set minus i okay upper number of cautious integral formula you see the formula and one in f is it by integral over c f is said by a set minus a d said in the manner formula i into f of is that plus i negative is it equal to minus i n inside upon f of minus i everybody is minus i by minus i minus i so this is so this is equal to minus i by minus 2 by 1 e minus minus iu i important to the other and 1 by 2 so this is equal to 2 pi i into 1 by 2 okay minus i equal to one point four and value is a plus by is it minus 1 the whole square into is a plus 2 d is it where c is mode is at minus 2 is equal to 2 okay another denominator 0 equating is it minus 1 the whole square into is at minus 2 is equal to 0 power the number is at minus there is modulus of minus one modulus of minus one and a root of minus one in the square that is root one root one one and that one then e one another in the less than two one therefore is said equal to one lies inside sita okay this is equal to two word more or less of a set minus two inverse of 2 minus 2 okay 2 minus 2 in the marine and 1 2 minus 2 is equal to uh let's take question lizard plus 2 while the energy represent minus 2 okay plus 2 is equal to minus two and a tender approach that is equal to minus two what is that minus two is equal to minus two minus two is making more or less of minus four modulus of minus four then in the root four minus four the square that is root sixteen root sixteen and a four and that is greater than two two in a kind of melee value and therefore is it is equal to and uh is it is equal to uh minus two lies outside see the carbonyl is that minus a the whole power ndc is equal to 2 pi i by n minus 1 factorial into f and minus 1 dash of a if a lies inside see the korean algorithm formula is by n minus one factorial right now and that two over two minus one factorial one factorial into f dash of a in order to a equal to one up f dash of numerically denominately said and at the differentiating of f dash office it is equal to quotient rule quotient rule in the denominator indu is that plus 2 into derivative of numerators of square root of 82 we said minus numerator induced that is is that square into derivative of denominator is a plus 2 derivative 1 the whole by denominator square there is a z plus 2 the whole square equals denominator into derivative of numerator minus numerator into derivative of denominator the whole by denominator square and equivalent f dash of one nana f dash of one another plus one two one go to combine one plus two and then another three three into two okay minus of is it designed to one way by the one the whole by he said plus two in the remember one plus two that is three square three into two and six six minus one in the room and one of five five by nine another one for the mole equal to substituting an angle this is equal to 2 pi i into 1 factorial 1 9 raised intel into 5 by 9 5 by 9 very with any value of 10 pi i by 9 and answer okay let's try a little bit foreign equal to minus one could combo more or less office it is equal to modulus of minus one that is root of minus one in the square that is one and it is great greater than the radius one by two in a column greater than therefore a point everything in the outside is equal to modulus of one that is equal to one then that is also greater than one by two fathom outside so a the outside one minus 1 by e square minus 1 so f of 0 and 3 minus 1 by um sorry 3 minus 1 0 minus 1 by 0 minus 1 that is equal to 1 so in the answer okay minus 1 is equal to minus 1 by sn plus 1 by 2 by a sub plus 1 plus 1 by 2 by is it minus 1 the symbol okay okay oversee in the global c three is that minus one by acid and then at the strip level one by two negative plus one by two uh in the oversee three is at minus one by is that plus one d system at the step number that is equal to r plus one by two number four integral over c uh three is that minus one y is it minus one d is it in the middle any evidence the partial fraction uses the partial fraction initiation additional minus three z by he said into a set minus one into a set minus two d is it where c is mode acid is equal to three by two where c minus one is equal to a by a set plus b by is it minus one cross multiply attack one is equal to denominator but they said you believe so 1 is equal to b okay 0 is equal to 0 0 0 1 is equal to a into minus 1 a into minus 1 or a equal to minus 1 okay therefore 1 by is said into a set minus 1 and another 8 is 9 to the minus 1 1 so minus 1 by a sub in the b it is minus 2 by is it into a set minus 1 d is it is equal to one split unity integral integral over 7 minus sign and 2 for 4 minus 3 is set by a set denominator and then the terminal is it plus at all integral over c numerical one now on the integral over into the four minus three set by a set minus two numerator one no denominator is minus one numerator 4 minus 3 is that by is that minus 2 1 f of 0 4 by minus 2 gonna 4 minus 0 by 0 minus 2 which is equal to minus 2 no otherwise f minus three by one minus two four minus three and one one nana one by minus one in the numerical the minus one so this is equal to okay minus two pi i into f of zero and a minus j 1 plus 2 pi i into f of 1 and under minus 1 about minus 2 pi i e minus 2 greater than 4 pi i minus 2 pi i answer 2 pi i know okay [Music] square plus 4 into a set minus 1 the whole square equal to zero up everything i said square plus 4 equal to 0 negative is it minus 1 the whole square equal to 0 negative square plus 4 equal to zero norm is it square is equal to minus four and is it equal to plus or minus two y it's at minus one the whole square equal to zero and this is equal to one another point equal to one negative is which is less than the radius ana so is it equal to one lies inside c carbonyl minus 1 is equal to modulus of is understanding the 2 i minus 1 up in f modulus root of x square plus y square up over the real part minus 1 and the square root of 1 2 and an imaginary part of 2 y i finally you know 2 2 into square root of 4 which is equal to root five root finally to point something like that is greater than two two in a column okay the point outcome i said is equal to minus 2y i'm going to modulus of we said minus 1 is equal to modulus of minus 2 i minus 1 which is equal to root of minus 1 into square one nano minus 2 into square root of that is equal to root five root five and one root five minus two point something else is greater than two therefore is equal to minus two i lies outside see the nutella carbon deposit said by is it square plus 4 into is that minus 1 the whole square d is it in a integral over c e raised to is set by is that square plus 1 for the numerator the whole by f dash of android and x equal to one of f dash of one in the answers f is it is equal to e raised to e by a square plus four and you get a derivative in the remainder question rule or formula denominator is it square plus four into derivative of numerator error minus of numerator into that is e raised to e into derivative of denominator is it square plus four unless it's square root of eighty two is it the whole by denominator square that is a z square plus four the whole square i'm gonna enter and then f dash of one is certainly one good compound one plus four minus 2 into 1 minus 2 e raised to be said by 1 plus 4 and a 5 1 5 the whole square okay um find the whole square now remember 25 so this is equal to five years you said that minus two raised to the number of three e raised to e sorry three e by twenty five you said one one no one plus four not a five and a five into square root of twenty five negative apparently if dash of one g taylor so the substitute m m two pi i into three e by twenty five or this is equal to six pi e i by twenty five square by is that minus one into is it minus two now is it minus three now which is probably numbers equal to pi in the numerators integral formula to evaluate integral over c he said square plus one by a set minus one d said okay is it square minus one d is one negative and they said minus one into you said plus one on the limit either where you said equal to one and the minus one and the negative first one substitute zero minus one minus two now and that is root four equal to two greater than one of them minus one outside another enough i said square plus one by he said minus one guitar plus one numerator outside is it equal to minus one goes to a 0 raised to 4 plus 2 i is it cube d is it where c is mode is it is equal to 1 okay opponent denominator equation is raised to 4 plus 2 i square plus 2 we said minus 3 d is it where c is mode is that minus 2 is equal to 2 e is it square plus 2 is at minus 3 equal to 0 calculator simplify then we're telling you multiply minus 3 idm and 2 another he said plus 3 into uh is it minus one variable how about three into minus one minus three one or three plus minus one two one okay value number and then under minus three millimeter is it is equal to one number is that equal to one goes to minus one number another less than radius is it equal to minus three over comma minus five minus nine and root twenty five equal to five one and that is greater than ah integral equal to uh c five we said plus seven by i i said minus three outside this a boom is said minus one is it equal to one means is that minus one in another minus one d domain formula randomly okay you

Up Next

Cauchy's Integral Theorem: Complex Analysis Lecture

@iit

47.2K views•2010-05-03

Gain Recalibration in Hippocampal Path Integration: Math Theory

@1024kyz

144 views•2020-07-02

Complex Analysis: Singularities & Laurent Series | KTU Maths GYMAT301 Part 6

@RVSMathsAcademy

142.1K views•2020-12-30

The Mathematical Impossibility of Accurate World Maps

@Vox

23.3M views•2016-12-02

Related Study Plans & Knowledge Roadmaps

Structured learning paths in Mathematics

View All Mathematics Topics

Non-Euclidean Geometry: Models & Geodesics

01Euclid's Fifth Postulate and the Birth of New Geometries

02Hyperbolic Space and the Poincaré Disk Model

03Geodesics: Defining Straight Lines in Curved Spaces

+ 2 more learning modules

Explore Roadmap

Knot Theory — Moves, Coloring & Polynomials

01Introduction to Topology and Knots

02Reidemeister Moves & Knot Equivalence

03Knot Invariants and Tricolorability

+ 2 more learning modules

Explore Roadmap

Category Theory: Functors, Monads & FP

01Mathematical Foundations: Functions, Composition & Types

02Introduction to Category Theory: Objects & Morphisms

03Functors: Mapping Between Categories

+ 2 more learning modules

Explore Roadmap

Complex Analysis: Residues & Contour Integrals

01Foundations of Complex Numbers

02Complex Functions and Holomorphic Properties

03Complex Integration and Cauchy's Theorem

+ 2 more learning modules

Explore Roadmap